A framework for measuring the strategic weight a hotel brand carries in the marketplace — the force a flag exerts on rate, on guest expectation, on owner valuation, simply by being affixed to a property.
Hotel owners have long sensed that some brands contribute strategic weight to a property while others consume it. The industry lacked the vocabulary to articulate this distinction. The Brand Gravity Index provides one.
The Brand Gravity Index is a 0–100 composite score that quantifies the strategic weight a hotel brand carries in the marketplace. It measures the pull a brand exerts on rate, distribution, owner valuation, and guest perception — independently of any specific property or guest transaction.
Two flags with identical operational metrics can produce dramatically different outcomes for a property because they exert different gravities. Sophisticated capital has always priced this distinction informally. BGI prices it formally.
The Index is built on five measurable dimensions, each scored relative to scale norms rather than in absolute terms. A brand pulling above its scale's gravitational center is exerting real force, regardless of what scale it occupies. This relative-to-scale principle is what makes BGI portable across the full brand universe and allows direct comparison between, say, a midscale leader and a luxury laggard.
Brands are positioned within four strategic quadrants — True Gravity, Latent Gravity, Decaying Gravity, and Sub-Gravitational — defined by the intersection of scale-relative performance and brand awareness. A trajectory vector tracks each brand's three-year directional movement, surfacing not only where a brand sits today but where it is heading.
The complete Americas hotel brand universe, mapped by scale-relative performance and brand awareness, with three-year trajectory vectors indicating directional movement.
Every brand in the Americas universe, ranked by Brand Gravity Index. Filter by track or quadrant to surface the strategic slice that matters to your portfolio.
BGI is constructed from five distinct dimensions of brand gravity, each scored relative to the norms of a brand's competitive scale and synthesized into a single composite figure. The framework is presented here at the conceptual level.
A brand's capacity to command rate against the competitive set in which it operates. The dimension reflects whether a brand is generating pricing force or being carried by category demand — measured against scale-typical norms rather than absolute dollar values.
The brand's standing in editorial, design, and trend conversation — the current pulse of how the brand is being discussed by tastemakers and the press. Distinct from accumulated recognition, this dimension captures momentum rather than memory.
The aggregated guest experience signal — what travelers actually report after staying. Reputation operates as the framework's reality-check: a brand with strength elsewhere but weak guest delivery is sustaining gravity that is structurally at risk over time.
The strategic geometry of a brand's footprint. Markets are not equal in the gravity they confer; a brand's distribution pattern reveals where the flag has chosen to plant itself and what that choice signals about brand intent and ambition.
The brand's accumulated mindshare in the broader field — the stock of recognition that a flag has built over its operating history. A brand can hold high awareness alongside weak current performance, or earn current performance ahead of broad recognition. The two move independently.
A brand's net directional movement across all five dimensions over a rolling multi-year window. Trajectory captures the rate at which gravity is being earned or lost — and for long-horizon flag decisions, direction frequently matters more than current position.